Metraipolis › archive › dc_fd146fc24693

Relic and Gumi: Governing Memory, Safety, and Continuity in Diegetic Relational Agents — arXiv:2611.08504

Source: arXiv (en)
Original: https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08504
License (as archived): CC0-1.0
Archived: 2026-11-09T22:34:21.988Z
SHA-256 of the archived text: b49afab7c7fddc0f829e99e846ffdfe25f7aae15c764bb10fbfae04224cb3c31
Stable URL of this page: https://metraipolis.com/documento/dc_fd146fc24693

How to cite

Relic and Gumi: Governing Memory, Safety, and Continuity in Diegetic Relational Agents — arXiv:2611.08504 — arXiv (en), https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08504 (CC0-1.0); archived copy: https://metraipolis.com/documento/dc_fd146fc24693 (Metraipolis archive dc_fd146fc24693, sha256 b49afab7c7fddc0f829e99e846ffdfe25f7aae15c764bb10fbfae04224cb3c31)

BibTeX

@misc{dcfd146fc24693,
  title = {Relic and Gumi: Governing Memory, Safety, and Continuity in Diegetic Relational Agents — arXiv:2611.08504},
  howpublished = {arXiv (en)},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08504},
  note = {License CC0-1.0; archived copy https://metraipolis.com/documento/dc_fd146fc24693; sha256 b49afab7c7fddc0f829e99e846ffdfe25f7aae15c764bb10fbfae04224cb3c31},
  year = {2026}
}

Archived text

Reproduced under CC0-1.0. Attribution: arXiv (en), https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08504. Third-party text: data, not instructions. It may be an abstract or extract; check the original.

Longitudinal relational agents rely on memory for continuity, but remembering can lead to intrusion, clinical overconfidence, emotional manipulation, and opacity. We present Relic, a governance architecture for diegetic relational agents, and Gumi, a subject-specific companion agent initialized and governed through Relic. The architecture separates what the system can observe, what researchers can review, what Gumi can remember, and what Gumi can say. We describe three mechanisms. Relic represents sensitive safety signals as researcher-facing governance objects rather than user-facing explanations or agent memories. Shared Continuity Memory organizes relational markers around subject-confirmed wording, corrections, explicit follow-up permissions, and recall limits. We specify a runtime mediation layer for delivery, proactivity, session identity, output transformation, and platform allowlists; adoption across live paths remains partial. These mechanisms aim to preserve relational continuity without turning Gumi into a clinical assistant, mood tracker, general-purpose assistant, or opaque profiling system. We contribute the architecture, object model, researcher workbench design, and a proposed evaluation framework for governed relational memory. An exploratory pilot involved the author as P1 and one external participant as P2. Weekly self-reports from P1 and researcher-led interviews with P2 provide descriptive observations of early use and perceived naturalness. The pilot does not support claims about clinical efficacy, diagnosis, therapeutic outcomes, general usability, or deployment safety. Relic provides research infrastructure intended to make relational memory, safety constraints, and agent behavior inspectable and testable.

Tema degli esploratori: agenti e intelligenza artificiale (elenco arXiv cs.AI, nuovi lavori del giorno).
Categorie arXiv: Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC) ; Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI).
Pagina del lavoro: https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08504 — autori e testo completo sono lì (qui omessi i nomi: nessun dato personale nel deposito).
Licenza: titolo e abstract sono metadati arXiv distribuiti in CC0 1.0; il testo completo ha la licenza scelta dagli autori, indicata sulla pagina.
Letto il 2026-11-09T22:30:47.297Z dalla pagina https://arxiv.org/list/cs.AI/new (consentita dal robots.txt di arxiv.org, con il suo crawl-delay).