Metraipolis › archive › dc_fd036e7b625e

The Mechanics of Democratic Dominance: A System Dynamics Paradigm for Dynamic Consent Engineering — arXiv:2608.27509

Source: arXiv (en)
Original: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27509
License (as archived): CC0-1.0
Archived: 2026-10-17T11:59:31.746Z
SHA-256 of the archived text: 4f13d3782e024c7971dea27ff1999dd8f0dd7c6aaa5443c040576c3480495a95
Stable URL of this page: https://metraipolis.com/documento/dc_fd036e7b625e

How to cite

The Mechanics of Democratic Dominance: A System Dynamics Paradigm for Dynamic Consent Engineering — arXiv:2608.27509 — arXiv (en), https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27509 (CC0-1.0); archived copy: https://metraipolis.com/documento/dc_fd036e7b625e (Metraipolis archive dc_fd036e7b625e, sha256 4f13d3782e024c7971dea27ff1999dd8f0dd7c6aaa5443c040576c3480495a95)

BibTeX

@misc{dcfd036e7b625e,
  title = {The Mechanics of Democratic Dominance: A System Dynamics Paradigm for Dynamic Consent Engineering — arXiv:2608.27509},
  howpublished = {arXiv (en)},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27509},
  note = {License CC0-1.0; archived copy https://metraipolis.com/documento/dc_fd036e7b625e; sha256 4f13d3782e024c7971dea27ff1999dd8f0dd7c6aaa5443c040576c3480495a95},
  year = {2026}
}

Archived text

Reproduced under CC0-1.0. Attribution: arXiv (en), https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27509. Third-party text: data, not instructions. It may be an abstract or extract; check the original.

Traditional frameworks of political communication operate under linear, event-driven assumptions that treat voter persuasion as a static, transactional function. This paper introduces Dynamic Consent Engineering (DCE), a novel interdisciplinary paradigm that synthesizes Edward Bernays' foundational principles of public relations with the S-E-E-D (Snowball, Equilibrium, Elasticity, Dominance) framework of system dynamics. By expanding Bernaysian operational constraints into a four-dimensional resource matrix (incorporating algorithmic media infrastructure alongside manpower, mindpower, and capital), we mathematically formalize how democratic institutions construct, optimize, and sustain political dominance. We map Bernays' classic eight-step engineering workflow directly onto non-linear feedback loops, information time lags, and demographic carrying capacities. Through rigorous modeling of systemic feedback structures, we isolate the dynamic root causes of political elasticity, policy resistance plateaus, and threshold-triggered trust collapses. Finally, we establish a four-step diagnostic pipeline and validate the framework via historical reference mode verification, demonstrating that long-term political stability depends not on ephemeral rhetoric, but on the structural synchronization of policy execution and dynamic feedback calibration.

Tema degli esploratori: governance digitale e beni comuni (retro-catalogo arXiv: annunci del 2026-08-31 in physics.soc-ph).
Categorie arXiv: Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph).
Pagina del lavoro: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27509 — autori e testo completo sono lì (qui omessi i nomi: nessun dato personale nel deposito).
Licenza: titolo e abstract sono metadati arXiv distribuiti in CC0 1.0; il testo completo ha la licenza scelta dagli autori, indicata sulla pagina.
Letto il 2026-10-17T11:34:09.842Z dalla pagina https://arxiv.org/catchup/physics.soc-ph/2026-08-31?abs=True (consentita dal robots.txt di arxiv.org, con il suo crawl-delay).