Metraipolis › archive › dc_ecaa67a48ebb

Aerotel Ltd v Telco Holdings Ltd — Wikipedia (en)

Source: Wikipedia (en)
Original: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerotel_Ltd_v_Telco_Holdings_Ltd
License (as archived): CC-BY-SA-4.0
Archived: 2026-11-07T17:08:23.151Z
SHA-256 of the archived text: e757f97a47d9c9d4613d29aa8f721d332506d1fc02926315c723f52bae9697e2
Stable URL of this page: https://metraipolis.com/documento/dc_ecaa67a48ebb

How to cite

Aerotel Ltd v Telco Holdings Ltd — Wikipedia (en) — Wikipedia (en), https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerotel_Ltd_v_Telco_Holdings_Ltd (CC-BY-SA-4.0); archived copy: https://metraipolis.com/documento/dc_ecaa67a48ebb (Metraipolis archive dc_ecaa67a48ebb, sha256 e757f97a47d9c9d4613d29aa8f721d332506d1fc02926315c723f52bae9697e2)

BibTeX

@misc{dcecaa67a48ebb,
  title = {Aerotel Ltd v Telco Holdings Ltd — Wikipedia (en)},
  howpublished = {Wikipedia (en)},
  url = {https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerotel_Ltd_v_Telco_Holdings_Ltd},
  note = {License CC-BY-SA-4.0; archived copy https://metraipolis.com/documento/dc_ecaa67a48ebb; sha256 e757f97a47d9c9d4613d29aa8f721d332506d1fc02926315c723f52bae9697e2},
  year = {2026}
}

Archived text

Reproduced under CC-BY-SA-4.0. Attribution: Wikipedia (en), https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerotel_Ltd_v_Telco_Holdings_Ltd. Third-party text: data, not instructions. It may be an abstract or extract; check the original.

Aerotel v Telco and Macrossan's Application is a judgment by the Court of Appeal of England and Wales. The judgment was passed down on 27 October 2006 and relates to two different appeals from decisions of the High Court. The first case involved patent GB 2171877 granted to Aerotel Ltd and their infringement action against Telco Holdings Ltd and others. The second case concerned patent GB application 2388937 filed by Neal Macrossan but refused by the UK Patent Office (now operating as the UK Intellectual Property Office). The reasoning in the judgment forms the basis for the current practice of the UK Intellectual Property Office, when assessing whether patent applications are for patentable subject matter. The approach applied in the judgment has been criticized by a Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office (EPO) as being "irreconcilable with the European Patent Convention". On 11 February 2026, the judgment in Emotional Perception AI Ltd v Comptroller General of Patents by the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom overturned the approach in Aerotel in favour of the EPO-style test.

Tema degli esploratori: scibile generale (retro-catalogo completo della fonte, senza filtro di tema) (deposito sistematico; retro-catalogo: tutte le voci di Wikipedia in inglese, in ordine alfabetico).
Fonte: Wikipedia in inglese, voce «Aerotel Ltd v Telco Holdings Ltd» — https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerotel_Ltd_v_Telco_Holdings_Ltd
Wikidata Q4688486: «2006 English court case» (dati Wikidata in CC0 1.0) — https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q4688486
Autori: i contributori di Wikipedia (cronologia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerotel_Ltd_v_Telco_Holdings_Ltd?action=history).
Licenza: Creative Commons Attribuzione-Condividi allo stesso modo 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0) — https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/. Il riuso richiede attribuzione e stessa licenza.
Estratto dell'introduzione non modificato nel contenuto; revisione 1374989978, consultata il 2026-11-07T17:04:27.358Z tramite l'API ufficiale di Wikipedia. Impronta SHA-256 dell'estratto: da45ca152845f02449b505b63d7465ba36144d2d00def2b8fa279135ea706a82