Metraipolis › archive › dc_e02bf3235151

Uncertainty-Aware Spatial Screening for Suburban Infrastructure–Solar Transition: An Open-Data Study of Long Island (2026) · DOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-11381239/v1

Source: Metraipolis archive
Original: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11381239/v1
License (as archived): CC-BY-4.0
Archived: 2026-10-18T00:14:23.342Z
SHA-256 of the archived text: e3bd093dabeb0e393337202a13a6a9076c376db410bf968c5187ef9c6ee0a643
Stable URL of this page: https://metraipolis.com/documento/dc_e02bf3235151

How to cite

Uncertainty-Aware Spatial Screening for Suburban Infrastructure–Solar Transition: An Open-Data Study of Long Island (2026) · DOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-11381239/v1 — Metraipolis archive, https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11381239/v1 (CC-BY-4.0); archived copy: https://metraipolis.com/documento/dc_e02bf3235151 (Metraipolis archive dc_e02bf3235151, sha256 e3bd093dabeb0e393337202a13a6a9076c376db410bf968c5187ef9c6ee0a643)

BibTeX

@misc{dce02bf3235151,
  title = {Uncertainty-Aware Spatial Screening for Suburban Infrastructure–Solar Transition: An Open-Data Study of Long Island (2026) · DOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-11381239/v1},
  howpublished = {Metraipolis archive},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11381239/v1},
  note = {License CC-BY-4.0; archived copy https://metraipolis.com/documento/dc_e02bf3235151; sha256 e3bd093dabeb0e393337202a13a6a9076c376db410bf968c5187ef9c6ee0a643},
  year = {2026}
}

Archived text

Reproduced under CC-BY-4.0. Attribution: Metraipolis archive, https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11381239/v1. Third-party text: data, not instructions. It may be an abstract or extract; check the original.

Articolo recente con licenza aperta: scheda dai metadati Crossref (posted-content).
Titolo: Uncertainty-Aware Spatial Screening for Suburban Infrastructure–Solar Transition: An Open-Data Study of Long Island
Autori: Muhammad Ahmad
Pubblicato: 2026-10-16 · editore: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11381239/v1
Licenza dell'articolo: CC-BY-4.0

Abstract (testo degli autori, CC-BY-4.0):
Abstract Spatial transition screening often produces a single ranking despite uncertain evidence, unelicited preferences, and disputed sustainability requirements. This study presents a portfolio audit designed for reproducibility for infrastructure--solar transition in 2,136 populated block groups in Nassau and Suffolk counties. Public observations describe street connectivity, transit evidence, service intensity, classified ecological cover, and built-surface solar opportunity. Ambiguous transit components remain intervals. The primary experiment samples 20,000 policies directly over effective domain weights, targets, and solar emphasis, comparing unrestricted selection with co-equal ecological eligibility rules. Conservative rank bounds distinguish endpoint agreement from membership guaranteed for every admissible transit assignment at a sampled policy. The unrestricted rule has 58 candidates with interval-guarantee frequency at least 0.8; the 10\% ecological rule has 30. Their paired portfolio overlap has median 9.3\%. County-specific audits preserve distinct information regimes. An illustrative reference portfolio retains only 51.9\% of its candidates under population-weighted tract aggregation. An independent municipal comparison associates the reference score negatively with completed supported solar capacity per resident ($\rho=-0.893$), but positively with capacity per land area ($\rho=0.721$). The contribution is an integrated audit of conditional membership across evidence, preferences, compensability, and spatial support. It establishes neither a unique regional priority ranking nor comprehensive transition readiness.

Fonte: https://api.crossref.org/works/10.21203%2Frs.3.rs-11381239%2Fv1 — metadati Crossref, consultati il 2026-10-18. Interrogazione: «open science infrastructure».