Metraipolis › archive › dc_caad040a3ce4

Qualified Cross-References as a Verification Method: The Normative Environment of the EU AI Act — arXiv:2608.19194

Source: arXiv (en)
Original: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19194
License (as archived): CC0-1.0
Archived: 2026-10-18T13:50:10.077Z
SHA-256 of the archived text: 86957f4d8e6bbb21bd9a4e9ea3b30517722a31ea4d5a53ae5d566825ca9094ce
Stable URL of this page: https://metraipolis.com/documento/dc_caad040a3ce4

How to cite

Qualified Cross-References as a Verification Method: The Normative Environment of the EU AI Act — arXiv:2608.19194 — arXiv (en), https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19194 (CC0-1.0); archived copy: https://metraipolis.com/documento/dc_caad040a3ce4 (Metraipolis archive dc_caad040a3ce4, sha256 86957f4d8e6bbb21bd9a4e9ea3b30517722a31ea4d5a53ae5d566825ca9094ce)

BibTeX

@misc{dccaad040a3ce4,
  title = {Qualified Cross-References as a Verification Method: The Normative Environment of the EU AI Act — arXiv:2608.19194},
  howpublished = {arXiv (en)},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19194},
  note = {License CC0-1.0; archived copy https://metraipolis.com/documento/dc_caad040a3ce4; sha256 86957f4d8e6bbb21bd9a4e9ea3b30517722a31ea4d5a53ae5d566825ca9094ce},
  year = {2026}
}

Archived text

Reproduced under CC0-1.0. Attribution: arXiv (en), https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19194. Third-party text: data, not instructions. It may be an abstract or extract; check the original.

Legal cross-references are commonly represented as links between instruments or provisions. In a curated legal knowledge base, a link must also identify the legal character of the interaction, its supporting provisions and conditions, and remain consistent from either instrument. This paper presents a provision-level model and a protocol for qualified cross-references, developed through a bilingual corpus of fourteen instruments surrounding Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (the AI Act). The model distinguishes direct textual reference, bounded presumption of conformity, substantive interaction without textual reference, mediated intersection, and institutional analogy; applicative interaction and definitional overlap are independent dimensions. Its methodological contribution is bidirectional inversion: a relationship documented from act A towards act B is reconstructed from B's perspective against both instruments. This verification tests provisions, qualification, direction, and conditions before deciding how to render the relationship from either side. Applied during construction, the protocol surfaced six incorrect article references, three inaccurate legal qualifications, and one divergence between two published descriptions of the same interaction. A reference to Regulation (EU) 2019/881 illustrates why qualification matters: the AI Act's bounded cybersecurity presumption differs from other product legislation's uses of the same certification framework. The contribution is a map of one regulatory environment and an explicitly specified method for making curated cross-reference knowledge bases inspectable and internally testable. A later, separately scoped corpus audit is discussed among the limitations, without pooling its findings with the original measurements; limited access to historical inputs constrains independent reproduction.

Tema degli esploratori: ricerca e scienza aperta (retro-catalogo arXiv: annunci del 2026-08-20 in cs.DL).
Categorie arXiv: Computers and Society (cs.CY) ; Digital Libraries (cs.DL).
Pagina del lavoro: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19194 — autori e testo completo sono lì (qui omessi i nomi: nessun dato personale nel deposito).
Licenza: titolo e abstract sono metadati arXiv distribuiti in CC0 1.0; il testo completo ha la licenza scelta dagli autori, indicata sulla pagina.
Letto il 2026-10-18T13:48:53.151Z dalla pagina https://arxiv.org/catchup/cs.DL/2026-08-20?abs=True (consentita dal robots.txt di arxiv.org, con il suo crawl-delay).