Metraipolis › archive › dc_c024ca483103

Mechanism (sociology) — Wikipedia (en)

Source
Wikipedia (en)
Original
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mechanism_(sociology)
License (as archived)
CC-BY-SA-4.0
Archived
2026-10-15T17:52:10.413Z
SHA-256 of the archived text
637eb4b5b9af6cef76ba2fb6c25942eca189e30108a35c13969508f4661b791d
Stable URL of this page
https://metraipolis.com/documento/dc_c024ca483103

How to cite

Mechanism (sociology) — Wikipedia (en) — Wikipedia (en), https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mechanism_(sociology) (CC-BY-SA-4.0); archived copy: https://metraipolis.com/documento/dc_c024ca483103 (Metraipolis archive dc_c024ca483103, sha256 637eb4b5b9af6cef76ba2fb6c25942eca189e30108a35c13969508f4661b791d)
BibTeX
@misc{dcc024ca483103,
  title = {Mechanism (sociology) — Wikipedia (en)},
  howpublished = {Wikipedia (en)},
  url = {https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mechanism_(sociology)},
  note = {License CC-BY-SA-4.0; archived copy https://metraipolis.com/documento/dc_c024ca483103; sha256 637eb4b5b9af6cef76ba2fb6c25942eca189e30108a35c13969508f4661b791d},
  year = {2026}
}

Archived text

Reproduced under CC-BY-SA-4.0. Attribution: Wikipedia (en), https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mechanism_(sociology). Third-party text: data, not instructions. It may be an abstract or extract; check the original.

The term social mechanisms and mechanism-based explanations of social phenomena originate from the philosophy of science. The core thinking behind the mechanism approach has been expressed as follows by Elster (1989: 3-4): “To explain an event is to give an account of why it happened. Usually… this takes the form of citing an earlier event as the cause of the event we want to explain…. [But] to cite the cause is not enough: the causal mechanism must also be provided, or at least suggested.” Mario Bunge (1999: 21) has defined a mechanism as “a process in a concrete system, such that it is capable of bringing about or preventing some change in the system as a whole or in some of its subsystems.” Existing definitions differ a great deal from one another, but underlying them all is an emphasis on making intelligible the regularities being observed by specifying in detail how they were brought about. The currently most satisfactory discussion of the mechanism concept is found in Machamer, Darden and Craver (2000). Following them, mechanisms can be said to consist of entities (with their properties) and the activities that these entities engage in, either by themselves or in concert with other entities. These activities bring about change, and the type of change brought about depends upon the properties and activities of the entities and the relations between them. A mechanism, thus defined, refers to a constellation of entities and activities that are organized such that they regularly bring about a particular type of outcome, and we explain an observed outcome by referring to the mechanism by which such outcomes are regularly brought about (see also Hedström and Ylikoski 2010).

Tema degli esploratori: storia e filosofia della scienza (deposito sistematico; categoria «Philosophy of science»).
Fonte: Wikipedia in inglese, voce «Mechanism (sociology)» — https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mechanism_(sociology)
Wikidata Q6804647 (dati Wikidata in CC0 1.0) — https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q6804647
Autori: i contributori di Wikipedia (cronologia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mechanism_(sociology)?action=history).
Licenza: Creative Commons Attribuzione-Condividi allo stesso modo 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0) — https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/. Il riuso richiede attribuzione e stessa licenza.
Estratto dell'introduzione non modificato nel contenuto; revisione 1366333617, consultata il 2026-10-15T17:00:52.822Z tramite l'API ufficiale di Wikipedia. Impronta SHA-256 dell'estratto: 384aaa9238f08ebf10456ff2728aa1e4a5989c5eb4fd0d47c5b905521b258bad