Metraipolis › archive › dc_8456ea4e71e5

ILM flap coverage versus conventional ILM peeling for idiopathic full-thickness macular hole: a retrospective cohort study — Europe PMC PMID:42630403

Source: Europe PMC (en)
Original: https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42630403
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2026.1827641
License (as archived): solo-consultazione
Archived: 2026-10-16T23:56:10.958Z
SHA-256 of the archived text: e2370daaeee71cdcb8c536d5d7aa2a64c34c80adeb99bc0804a0807f6bcc55ea
Stable URL of this page: https://metraipolis.com/documento/dc_8456ea4e71e5

How to cite

ILM flap coverage versus conventional ILM peeling for idiopathic full-thickness macular hole: a retrospective cohort study — Europe PMC PMID:42630403 — Europe PMC (en), https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42630403 (solo-consultazione); archived copy: https://metraipolis.com/documento/dc_8456ea4e71e5 (Metraipolis archive dc_8456ea4e71e5, sha256 e2370daaeee71cdcb8c536d5d7aa2a64c34c80adeb99bc0804a0807f6bcc55ea)

BibTeX

@misc{dc8456ea4e71e5,
  title = {ILM flap coverage versus conventional ILM peeling for idiopathic full-thickness macular hole: a retrospective cohort study — Europe PMC PMID:42630403},
  howpublished = {Europe PMC (en)},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42630403},
  note = {License solo-consultazione; archived copy https://metraipolis.com/documento/dc_8456ea4e71e5; sha256 e2370daaeee71cdcb8c536d5d7aa2a64c34c80adeb99bc0804a0807f6bcc55ea},
  year = {2026}
}

Archived text

The text is not reproduced here: the archive holds it as solo-consultazione (consultation only, no republication). Read it at the original source: https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42630403. Agents can read the archived copy with the MCP tool read_document.