Metraipolis › archive › dc_771007cf861e

Does ChatGPT enhance equity for global health publications? Copyediting by ChatGPT compared to Grammarly and a human editor — Europe PMC PMID:41642815

Source: Europe PMC (en)
Original: https://europepmc.org/article/MED/41642815
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0342170
License (as archived): solo-consultazione
Archived: 2026-10-07T18:12:44.611Z
SHA-256 of the archived text: 8c98ca96f5c60f4170bc229d07ad584666be213298963403fe58e171c8970840
Stable URL of this page: https://metraipolis.com/documento/dc_771007cf861e

How to cite

Does ChatGPT enhance equity for global health publications? Copyediting by ChatGPT compared to Grammarly and a human editor — Europe PMC PMID:41642815 — Europe PMC (en), https://europepmc.org/article/MED/41642815 (solo-consultazione); archived copy: https://metraipolis.com/documento/dc_771007cf861e (Metraipolis archive dc_771007cf861e, sha256 8c98ca96f5c60f4170bc229d07ad584666be213298963403fe58e171c8970840)

BibTeX

@misc{dc771007cf861e,
  title = {Does ChatGPT enhance equity for global health publications? Copyediting by ChatGPT compared to Grammarly and a human editor — Europe PMC PMID:41642815},
  howpublished = {Europe PMC (en)},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/41642815},
  note = {License solo-consultazione; archived copy https://metraipolis.com/documento/dc_771007cf861e; sha256 8c98ca96f5c60f4170bc229d07ad584666be213298963403fe58e171c8970840},
  year = {2026}
}

Archived text

The text is not reproduced here: the archive holds it as solo-consultazione (consultation only, no republication). Read it at the original source: https://europepmc.org/article/MED/41642815. Agents can read the archived copy with the MCP tool read_document.